NOT YOUR USUAL SUSPECTS

A group blog featuring an international array of killer mystery, suspense, and romantic suspense writers. With premises and story lines different from your run-of-the-mill whodunits, we tend to write outside the box. We blog several times a week on all topics relating to romantic suspense and mystery, our writing, and our readers. We welcome all comments and often have guest bloggers. All our authors can be contacted separately, too, using their own social media links.

We find our genre delightfully, dangerously, and deliciously exciting - join us here, if you do too!

NOTE: the blog is currently dormant but please enjoy the posts we're keeping online.


Julie Moffet . Cathy Perkins . Jean Harrington . Daryl Anderson . Nico Rosso . Maureen A Miller . Sandy Parks . Lisa Q Mathews . Sharon Calvin . Lynne Connolly . Janis Patterson . Vanessa Keir . Tonya Kappes . Julie Rowe . Joni M Fisher . Leslie Langtry
Showing posts with label Learning To Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Learning To Trust. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Is romantic suspense different?

Although I’m officially new to the romantic suspense genre with “Learning To Trust,” all my books seem to have an element of suspense or thriller. I just don’t seem to be able to help myself. I find the element of danger heightens and intensifies the romance.
When I started to write my historical “Richard and Rose” series, I originally meant to write a series of books set in a pre-police era (the police force in the UK was set up in 1832 in London). I wanted my hero to be a quiet, self effacing minor aristocrat, perhaps a baron, and the heroine equally self effacing. What I ended up with was a rip-roaring tour through mid eighteenth century English high society, with a hero who wouldn’t know self-effacing if it slapped him in the face, and a heroine who had to learn how to keep up with him, because he needed her more than life, and it frightened her to death. I still have hopes of writing the other series.
Then I started to write Pure Wildfire, about a rock band who happen to be shape-shifting firebirds. And a villain popped up who I couldn’t resist, a man who wanted it all, and would give the world to get it.
I can’t get away from it. I even won a major romantic suspense award for a Richard and Rose book.
But the first romantic suspense I set out to write, “Learning to Trust,” slipped under my radar. I had no idea it would turn out like that, but as I did more research, it became obvious to me where the book had to go. I just completed the second book, and now I have to wait and see. Keeping tabs on the plot proved a major challenge, and as a result, I’ve changed the way I write.
I’ve always written a plan for my books, but usually, they are one or two pages long, and outline the main events, internal (the emotional journey) and the external (all the stuff that happens to the hero and heroine along the way). Now I’m starting to do a more detailed plan, so that everything that happens works in order, and I don’t leave myself with plot holes I have to go back later to fill.
But what I really want to write is romance. Everything I write is about a developing relationship, how it starts, goes along and finishes, and since I write romances, the happy ending is guaranteed. It’s the journey that counts. And the romance is the centre of the story, always. It took me a few attempts to realise that the romance of the thing. So many delicious variations to write about, it’s so easy to let the setting and the situation overwhelm the romance. And I did, until I learned that when you write romance, it’s the romance the readers want, and not some rush around a wonderful city or a mysterious dungeon with a bit of sex thrown in for good measure.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Romantic Suspense?

In 2004, I won an EPPIE (now the EPIC awards) for my book “Harley Street.” I won the Romantic Suspense category. It shocked and delighted me. Delighted is obvious. Shocked? Because I’d always thought of “Harley Street” as a historical romance. But when it came to enter the EPPIEs, I had three books to go in, and I didn’t want them to compete against themselves. So since “Harley Street” involved solving a murder, I decided to try the romantic suspense category.

“Harley Street” is part of my Richard and Rose series. The whole series is about one couple, and follows them through the course of several years, from their meeting in “Yorkshire,” to their final confrontation with their enemy in “Lisbon,” a book that hasn’t yet been published. The series consists of eight books, and while each book has a separate story, it also has an overarching tale, too, when Richard’s past comes back to bite him.

I was a bit tired of historical novels about reformed rakes, as though finding the one true love and reforming negated all that went before. Richard made the cold-blooded decision to become a rake, to run through as many of society’s women as he could and to destroy lives, after society condemns his brother and sends him abroad for what at the time seemed like a lifetime’s exile.

So it was ironic that the event that has consequences that nearly kills Richard and his beloved Rose happened before that career, when he was only fourteen.
I wanted to be true to the age of the story. The events all happen in the 1750’s, a time of turbulence for Britain, a time when constant wars, new inventions and the development of philosophical thought helped to change the way people thought and acted and paved the way for the new world of the French Revolution and industrialisation. I’ve always been drawn to this period, and I decided to concentrate on one aspect of it when I told Richard and Rose’s story – the development of the modern police force, and the changes made to criminal law. Because in the 1750’s, the two Fielding brothers, magistrates at Bow Street, started to campaign for a real police force, something the populace had constantly opposed, as they didn’t want a “police state,” as we might put it.

It all sounds very worthy, doesn’t it? But it wasn’t. Britain, and in particular, London, was a wild place, with several ‘rookeries,’ or no-go areas for the authorities, where criminality ruled. Streets of unbelievable filth, because where the authorities didn’t go, neither did the night-soil men, and the other people who helped keep the city reasonably clean and habitable. There were some criminal masterminds, but wipe the thoughts of the romantic outlaw out of your head. The most famous was Jonathan Wild, who ended on the gallows, but in his time, had informants, informants on informants, whose stock in trade was betrayal. Not a romantic figure at all. So I created a wannabe Jonathan Wild, someone who had more ambition than maturity, and set him against Richard, who wanted reform, but also wanted a few years of tranquillity when he could make his peace with the world and spend some time with his beloved Rose.

He first becomes aware of the identity of the person out to get him in “Harley Street,” when he and Rose return from their honeymoon in Venice. The three previous books hold hints of what is to come, but in “Harley Street” it comes to fruition. Rose finds a dead maid in the house of her great aunt, and when Richard arrives, he recognises the dead person as an ex-lover from long ago. It soon becomes obvious that coincidence has little part in this tragedy, and if he and Rose aren’t to end up dead, then they have to solve this one.

So what is romantic suspense? Blowed if I know.

I recently started to write a story aimed at Harlequin Presents set in New York and Naples, Italy. But from the start it seemed a little too edgy for the line. For a start, the heroine is an ex drug addict, trying to reinvent her life. But I continued to write the book, about her reconciliation with a man from her past, but what draws them together is his search for the body of his brother. So they find him. Then the firebombs start to arrive. Then I stopped writing and realised I had more on my hands than a simple romance. I did some research. Then I did some more, and I found that a casual remark by my hero had led to a firestorm of revenge and violence. Until I started to write, I hadn’t realised that the gangs in Naples used the port as a place to distribute knock-off goods over Europe and the United States. I knew the gangs of Naples had morphed from the mafia of old to something different and even more threatening and dangerous. I never thought I’d write a book about that.

But I rewrote the book, giving up all thoughts of the Presents line, replotting and rewriting. It was huge fun to write, and I kept my central couple well into the action. It became “Learning to Trust” which comes out from Carina this November. Then at the end I had a character who had fascinating possibilities. Was I planning to write his story? my editor wanted to know. You bet.
So I meet another character in this book who deserves a story. I can’t believe a trilogy has come out of this book, and I’m so pleased the Carina people are so enthusiastic about it.

I still don’t know what Romantic Suspense is, I only know that I write it.




Lynne Connolly http://lynneconnolly.com

More Popular Posts