Occasionally I pick
up a book with a different lifestyle featured. A book about gay men
(mm) for instance, or a ménage (three people in a relationship
together). I enjoy them if they’re done well, and the way the
characters cope with their dilemma. In fact, I enjoy them enough to write one of my own. Sinless, set in the mid-eighteenth century, about the love affair between an aristocrat and a lawyer, was utterly fascinating to write. It's part of the Shaws trilogy and it's out next year. Now I want to write more. Okay, commercial over! But I did find a world waiting for me when I wrote it, and I do want to share some of what I learned.
I’ve
seen these books called anachronistic when they have a historical
setting.
They might be, but
the premise is not.
There have always
been people who need something different. However, right up until the
Georgian era, homosexuality, or to be more precise, sodomy, was
illegal, punishable by death.
There were
prosecutions, but most of them weren’t for the “crime” itself,
but for something else, like creating trouble, and in a fascinating
series of prosecutions and executions in the 1720’s, they were
associated with a Jacobite spy ring. At the time the Jacobites were
closely allied with the French, who were happy to use the exiled
royals as pawns in a bigger game. And there was a faction in British,
or more precisely, the English, who distrusted and disliked the
French.
Back to the gays.
They always existed, but when the punishment was to be hanged, there
was little to be gained in “coming out.” So they married, had
children, but also had boyfriends, or they went to houses where they
could meet with others of the same inclination. Unfortunately,
driving them underground put them in the same bracket as true
criminals in many people’s eyes, and thus the confusion with spying
and even murder.
Here’s the most
famous case from this time, Mother Clapp. A window into the past.
“Margaret Clap was
indicted for keeping a House in which she procur'd and encourag'd
Persons to commit Sodomy , on the 10th of December last and
before and after.
Samuel Stevens thus
depos'd. On Sunday Night the 14th of November. I went to the
Prisoners House in Field-Lane, Holbourn . I found near Men Fifty
there, making Love to one another as they call'd it. Sometimes they'd
sit in one anothers Laps, use their Hands indecently Dance and make
Curtsies and mimick the Language of Women - O Sir! - Pray Sir! - Dear
Sir! Lord how can ye serve me so! - Ah ye little dear Toad! Then
they'd go by Couples, into a Room on the same Floor to be marry'd as
they call'd it. The Door at that Room was kept by - Ecclestone to
prevent any body from balking their Diversions. - When they came out,
they used to brag in plain Terms, of what they had been doing, and
the Prisoner was present all the Time, except when she went out to
fetch Liquors. There was - Griffin among them, who was since hang'd
for Sodomy. - And Derwin who had been carried before Sir George
Martins for Sodomitical Practices with a Link Boy, he brag'd how he
had baffled the Link Boy's Evidence and the Prisoner boasted that
what she had said before Sir George, in Derwin's Favour, was a great
Means of bringing him off. - I went thither 2 or 3 Sundays following,
and found much the same Practices as before. They talk'd all manner
of the and most vile Obscenity in her Presence, and she appear'd
wonderfully pleas'd with it.
Joseph Sellers
depos'd to the same Purpose and added he believ'd there were above 40
Sodomies commited that Night.
The Prisoner in her
Defence, said that Darwin was taken up only for a Quarrel and that it
ought to be considered, that she was a Woman, and therefore it could
not be thought that she would ever be concern'd in such abonsinable
Practices. But the Evidence being full and positive, the Jury found
her Guilty .”
Plus ca change, plus
ca meme chose.
3 comments:
Fascinating, Lynne, and sad. The name Clapp has certainly been preserved! Wonder if this woman you describe was the source?
Heh--interesting post, Lynne. I wonder if she was hanged in the end?
It's fascinating to look back on how being gay was viewed through the ages, though a more sorry tale when you consider the individuals concerned. Thanks for sharing this singular case!
Post a Comment